Blog Post One- Kim Magnotta
Kim Magnotta
Professor Shirk
February 1, 2022
Faceless Beings
The painting is by Gideon Rubin. The title and date are unknown.
While discussing topics related to international politics, one must consider the effects of Europe’s influence on the rest of the globe. Historically, European colonialists have spread their religion, culture, and beliefs to less-developed countries, resulting in the dehumanization of those who were affected. Rather than being seen as “human”, colonists saw those in other states as faceless individuals who simply stood as hindrances to the European’s objectives. In his dissertation On the Culture of White Folk, W.E.B. Dubois touches upon these topics by describing where the European race failed. When discussing Europeans and their connection to Christianity, Dubois poses the question: “What Christian nations are today treating other nations as they would be treated?” In doing so, emphasis is placed on the shortcomings of European thought, as colonists are seen to be hypocrites, rather than honest and faithful individuals.
Gideon Rubin’s painting, featuring a group of faceless women standing in a line, represents a similar feeling of dehumanization. In the work, all the women are stripped of their identity, by their faces not being represented. Rather than seeing six women with different personalities and facial expressions, all the viewer experiences is an eerie sense of uniformity. The six women might as well be the same person, as nothing, aside from superficial hair color, can tell them apart. The women’s garments suggest a form of unsettling purity, while their bowed heads suggest that the women should act in a subservient or submissive manner. Interestingly, the women appear to be acquiescing to the instruction of another individual, who is not visible in the image. This further contributes to the unsettling nature of the image, as it removes more of the “personality” aspect that all humans seek.
European colonialism attempted to homogenize the world so that every country would follow a similar belief system as those in predominantly white societies. Just as Rubin Gideon’s painting eliminates the personal aspect of humankind, colonialism had the same effect. While European forces wanted to emulate their perspectives across state borders, it is important to acknowledge W.E.B Dubois’ perspective on this matter. In On the Culture of White Folk, Dubois states that “Europe has never produced, and never will in our day, a single human soul that cannot be matched, aye, and over matched in every line of human endeavor by Asia and Africa”. In saying this, Dubois acknowledges that there is nothing inherently unique about Europeans and that individuals who live on other continents should be seen as equally human. Furthermore, Dubois is saying that Europeans are not “special”, and that people who come from different backgrounds are equally as capable of improving society. Just as depicted in the painting, losing sight of the individual and grouping people who possess unique identities into large categories can have dangerous and dehumanizing effects. Rather than acknowledging people for their unique skill sets, it becomes much easier to take advantage of a population when you do not embrace their differences.
Perhaps worse than the act of being colonized is the process of losing your identity. When one is seen as a faceless individual, their own priorities seem meaningless to an innocent onlooker. Those who fell victim to the colonization strategies of the Europeans were unable to be accepted for their unique backgrounds. Rather, Europeans pushed the concept of assimilation onto those who they overtook. Therefore, it can be concluded that one of the greatest crimes against humanity is the loss of personal identity and difference. (580 words)
Blog Post Pols #170-The concepts I would like to compare today are the idea of international politics being continuous and changing to the evolution of protocols throughout the Covid-19 pandemic. While in international politics over the past 100 years there has been a large shift in European colonization to independent states governed by the natives of the nation, the dominance of these European nations since then has not completely gone away. Even though a place like South Africa is fairly successful in running an independent government, this does not change the fact that the nation has large ties to Great Britain and remains one of the nation's close allies and a crucial trade partner. This compares pretty nicely to Covid. Even though most still regard covid as a deadly disease that should be taken seriously, we went from complete stay-at-home orders to moderate autonomy to go out and enjoy the world. At one point public health officials were fairly adamant that wearing face masks would not be an effective way to stop the spread of the virus, but just a few months on from these statements and masking recommendations and requirements became a cornerstone of public health guidance. Another aspect of this disease that relates to the idea of some things changing while others are constant is the wisdom around symptomatic versus asymptomatic people being the ones to spread the disease. This knowledge has very much been up in the air for a long time with knowledge eventually shifting toward asymptomatic people not spreading the disease. Another idea that comes right off the back of this is the quarantining periods there are for people who contract the virus. While the initial quarantine period was up to 14 days in the modern-day it is only 5 days for people that have received the covid vaccine. Although there have been all these aforementioned changes, covid as a disease despite variations has maintained a fairly similar context. Despite the world being much better at dealing with the virus now nearly 2 years into the pandemic even outside of creating a life-saving vaccine, the hysteria around covid remains the same mostly. Everything around covid has changed, but the virus is still the virus and it is going to continue to impact our lives until we can somehow get it to go away. This is where I can circle back to the larger context of International Politics. Even though there are very few colonies left and states have gained larger autonomy, the influence of being colonized for decades to centuries makes it that many of these nations are still behested to the culture that dominated them for longer than they could remember. These nations have undergone much change, but at the end of the day, they still hold onto many parts that connect them to their makers. Overall though whether it is contemporary covid policy or international relations we hope that when change happens it can progress society. Making our world safe, prosperous, and happy is the goal of the majority and through changing policy in either regard we hope to get to a point where all of this could happen at the same time.
ReplyDeleteNice work with your blog post! I really enjoyed your overall topic connecting this painting to a concept seen in the readings. I liked your explanation of the painting, and you made it clear how you think the painting related the European cultural norms of colonization. I also thought your last paragraph was really insightful, and I wish you expanded on it more. But all in all great post!
ReplyDeleteThank you for the feedback. I will be sure to take your comments into consideration and make an adjustment for the next blog post!
Delete